Praxis Medical Insights

Est. 2024 • Clinical Guidelines Distilled

Made possible by volunteer editors from the University of Calgary & University of Alberta

Last Updated: 2/7/2026

Imaging Guidelines for Facial Trauma from Softball Impact

Clinical Assessment and Decision‑Making

  • After confirming airway, breathing, and circulation, a focused secondary survey should be performed to identify specific clinical signs that mandate imaging. The American College of Radiology recommends this systematic assessment. 4
  • Immediate CT maxillofacial imaging is indicated when any of the following are present:
    • Pain on manipulation of the upper jaw. 1
    • Pain over the zygoma or visible zygomatic deformity. 1 2
    • Facial elongation or malocclusion. 1 2
    • Infra‑orbital nerve paresthesia (numbness of the upper lip, lateral nose, or upper teeth). 1 7
    • Periorbital ecchymosis or marked facial edema. 2
    • Facial asymmetry or enophthalmos. 2
    • Tenderness on palpation of any facial bone prominence. 5
    • Visible contusion or edema over the frontal bone, midface, or mandible. 5

Preferred Imaging Modality

  • Multidetector CT (MDCT) is the gold‑standard initial imaging study for facial trauma; plain radiographs should not be used as the first test. 2 3 7
  • The 2022 ACR Appropriateness Criteria classify CT maxillofacial as “usually appropriate” for suspected mid‑face, frontal bone, or mandibular injuries. 1 2 3
  • CT provides superior sensitivity, detecting subtle nondisplaced fractures that plain films miss. 3 7 8
  • Multiplanar reconstructions from CT are essential for characterizing complex fracture patterns and for surgical planning. 2 3 7
  • CT acquisition is faster and less dependent on patient positioning than conventional radiography. 2 7
  • A single CT study evaluates all facial bones and adjacent soft tissues comprehensively. 2 3

Common Injury Patterns from Softball Impact

  • Zygoma fractures are the second‑most common isolated facial fracture in this mechanism. 2
  • Zygomaticomaxillary complex fractures involve the zygomatic arch, inferior orbital rim, and maxillary sinus walls. 1 2

Associated Intracranial and Cervical Injuries

  • When a midface fracture is identified, a concurrent head CT is advised because approximately 68 % of facial‑fracture patients have an associated head injury. 2
  • Orbital wall fractures carry a 9 % risk of concomitant intracranial injury. 2
  • Cervical spine imaging is recommended for high‑velocity mechanisms or neurological symptoms, given a 7–11.3 % incidence of cervical spine injury in facial‑fracture patients. 7

Situations Where Imaging May Be Deferred

  • In patients with only minor soft‑tissue injury (e.g., simple laceration or mild contusion) and none of the following:
    • No bony tenderness on palpation.
    • No malocclusion. 1
    • No nerve deficits. 1 7
    • No facial asymmetry or deformity. 2
    • Normal extra‑ocular movements.
  • In such cases, imaging can be postponed with close clinical follow‑up, but a low threshold for CT should be maintained because of the high‑velocity nature of the ball impact. 5

Limitations of Plain Radiography

  • Plain facial radiographs have limited diagnostic accuracy (approximately 53–82 % for nasal fractures) and do not change management decisions. The American College of Radiology therefore advises against their use as the initial study for significant trauma. 9