Praxis Medical Insights

Est. 2024 • Clinical Guidelines Distilled

Made possible by volunteer editors from the University of Calgary & University of Alberta

Last Updated: 10/8/2025

Evaluation and Management of Bladder Pain with Microhematuria

Initial Assessment

  • The American Urological Association (AUA) and the Society of Urodynamics, Female Pelvic Medicine and Urogenital Reconstruction (SUFU) recommend risk stratification using the 2025 AUA/SUFU criteria for patients with bladder pain and microhematuria, followed by cystoscopy and upper tract imaging for intermediate- or high-risk patients 1
  • A focused history should include smoking history, quantified as pack-years, as this is the strongest modifiable risk factor for urothelial malignancy 1
  • Age and sex are also important factors, with men ≥40 years and women ≥60 years having an elevated risk 1
  • Irritative voiding symptoms, such as urgency, frequency, and nocturia, may indicate interstitial cystitis or bladder cancer 2
  • Occupational exposures to benzenes, aromatic amines, or other chemical carcinogens should also be assessed 3
  • A history of gross hematuria, even if not currently present, is also relevant 1
  • Chronic pelvic pain patterns, particularly in women, should be evaluated as interstitial cystitis is often underdiagnosed 2
  • Physical examination should include blood pressure measurement to assess for renal parenchymal disease 1
  • Pelvic examination in women and rectal examination in men should be performed to exclude gynecologic and prostate causes, respectively 2
  • Serum creatinine should be obtained to evaluate renal function 1

Confirm True Hematuria and Exclude Benign Causes

  • Microscopic urinalysis is mandatory to confirm ≥3 RBCs/HPF, as dipstick alone has limited specificity and can yield false positives 4
  • If urinary tract infection is suspected, urine culture should be obtained before starting antibiotics, and urinalysis should be repeated 6 weeks post-treatment 2, 5
  • Benign causes, such as menstruation, vigorous exercise, sexual activity, and recent urologic procedures, should be excluded by repeating urinalysis 48 hours after cessation of these activities 2, 3

Risk Stratification Using 2025 AUA/SUFU Criteria

  • Patients should be categorized as low/negligible risk, intermediate risk, or high risk based on the 2025 AUA/SUFU criteria 1
  • Low/negligible risk patients have a malignancy risk of 0-0.4%, while intermediate risk patients have a malignancy risk of 0.2-3.1%, and high risk patients have a malignancy risk of 1.3-6.3% 4

Urologic Evaluation Based on Risk Category

  • For intermediate or high-risk patients, cystoscopy is mandatory to visualize the bladder and urethra 1, 2
  • Upper tract imaging, preferably CT urography, should be performed to evaluate for urologic pathology 2
  • Urine cytology should be obtained in patients with risk factors for transitional cell carcinoma 7, 5

Special Consideration: Interstitial Cystitis

  • Bladder pain with hematuria may indicate interstitial cystitis, particularly in women with chronic pelvic pain 2
  • Key features of interstitial cystitis include irritative voiding symptoms and pelvic/bladder pain 2

Follow-Up for Persistent Hematuria

  • If initial evaluation is negative but hematuria persists, repeat urinalysis should be performed at 6, 12, 24, and 36 months 3
  • Blood pressure should be monitored at each visit 3
  • Nephrology referral should be considered if hematuria persists with development of hypertension, proteinuria, or evidence of glomerular bleeding 3

REFERENCES