Praxis Medical Insights

Est. 2024 • Clinical Guidelines Distilled

Made possible by volunteer editors from the University of Calgary & University of Alberta

Last Updated: 9/2/2025

Neuraxial Spread During Interscalene Block: Volume Considerations

Risk Factors for Neuraxial Spread

  • Interscalene block performed at higher cervical levels increases the risk of neuraxial spread due to proximity to the neuraxis 1, 2
  • Traditional approaches using large volumes of local anesthetic increase the risk of spread to the epidural or subarachnoid space 1, 3

Recommendations for Safe Practice

  • The American Society of Anesthesiologists recommends using ultrasound guidance to visualize needle placement and local anesthetic spread, allowing for volume reduction 4, 1
  • Alternative approaches, such as axillary or infraclavicular approaches, may be safer than high interscalene approaches in patients at risk for neuraxial spread 1

Monitoring and Safety Considerations

  • Thorough testing for block success is essential to prevent the need for supplemental blocks or general anesthesia 4
  • Monitor for signs of high block for at least 30 minutes after block placement 1, 2
  • Have resuscitation equipment immediately available when performing any interscalene block 4, 3
  • Calculate safe dose of local anesthetic based on patient weight to prevent local anesthetic systemic toxicity 1

Common Pitfalls and Caveats

  • Failure to recognize that an interscalene catheter has migrated into the epidural or intrathecal space can lead to inadvertent administration of excessive local anesthetic doses 1, 2
  • Patients with anatomical variations or previous neck surgery may be at higher risk for neuraxial spread even with lower volumes 1
  • Sedation during block placement may mask early symptoms of neuraxial spread, so minimal sedation is recommended 4, 1
  • Even with ultrasound guidance and reduced volumes, vigilance for signs of neuraxial spread remains essential 4, 3