Praxis Medical Insights

Est. 2024 • Clinical Guidelines Distilled

Made possible by volunteer editors from the University of Calgary & University of Alberta

Last Updated: 11/28/2025

Upadacitinib in Axial Spondyloarthritis Treatment

Introduction to Upadacitinib

  • The American College of Rheumatology and the European League Against Rheumatism recommend upadacitinib for the treatment of active axial spondyloarthritis, including ankylosing spondylitis and non-radiographic axial SpA, particularly after inadequate response to NSAIDs or biologic DMARDs 1, 2, 3, 4

Evidence Supporting Use in Axial SpA

  • Upadacitinib has been proven effective and is indicated for ankylosing spondylitis (AS) treatment, distinguishing it from other JAK inhibitors like filgotinib which lacks this indication 1, 2, 3, 4
  • The 2022 GRAPPA guidelines extrapolate evidence from ankylosing spondylitis trials to recommend JAK inhibitors (including upadacitinib, tofacitinib, and filgotinib) for axial psoriatic arthritis based on phase II and phase II-III RCT data 5, 6

Treatment Algorithm for Axial SpA

  • TNF inhibitors remain first-line for most patients, but upadacitinib 15 mg once daily is an appropriate alternative, particularly when TNF inhibitors are contraindicated 1, 2, 3
  • After anti-TNF failure, swapping to JAK inhibitors including upadacitinib is recommended with 91% expert agreement 2, 3, 4
  • JAK inhibitors can be considered with 95-100% expert agreement depending on clinical context 1, 2, 3, 4

Special Considerations for IBD-Associated Axial SpA

  • TNF inhibitors (infliximab, adalimumab) remain first-line for active axial SpA with active IBD 1, 2, 4
  • After anti-TNF failure, JAK inhibitors can be considered with 95% agreement 1, 2, 4
  • Upadacitinib has dual indication: approved by EMA for both Crohn's disease and ankylosing spondylitis, making it particularly suitable for this population 1, 2, 3, 4

Critical Caveats

  • Active serious infections require treatment before initiating upadacitinib 7
  • Screen for latent tuberculosis, hepatitis B and C before initiation 7, 8
  • Baseline monitoring should include complete blood count with differential, liver enzymes, and lipid panel 7
  • Sulfasalazine and methotrexate are not recommended for purely axial disease due to lack of efficacy 2, 4
  • IL-17 inhibitors are absolutely contraindicated in active IBD as they can exacerbate Crohn's disease 8
  • Etanercept is ineffective in Crohn's disease and can trigger new-onset disease 4
  • Ongoing monitoring for signs of infection, particularly herpes zoster 7
  • Monitor for venous thromboembolism signs 7
  • Serial complete blood counts to assess for cytopenias 7
  • Do not automatically discontinue unless serious infection or malignancy is confirmed 7

REFERENCES

7

Upadacitinib-Associated Lymphadenopathy [LINK]

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

8

Alternatives to Infliximab in Inflammatory Bowel Disease [LINK]

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026