Diagnosis of Tuberculosis in Pediatric Patients
Collection Methods and Diagnostic Value
- The American Academy of Pediatrics suggests that mycobacterial culture of respiratory specimens is recommended for all children suspected of having pulmonary TB, with a conditional recommendation and moderate-quality evidence 1, 2
- GeneXpert MTB/RIF testing can replace sputum microscopy for initial diagnostic testing in children when available, especially in high TB prevalence settings, with a sensitivity of 73% and concordance of 96.8% compared to liquid culture 1, 3
- The diagnostic yield of GeneXpert is significantly affected by the age of the child, with higher yield in infants and older children 1
- The extent of disease also affects the diagnostic yield, with higher yield in symptomatic children with extensive disease 1
- The quality of specimen collection is crucial, with meticulous attention to detail during collection improving the yield 1
Practical Considerations and Important Caveats
- Collecting specimens on 3 consecutive mornings provides the best diagnostic yield 1
- Microbiological confirmation is more challenging in children than adults due to the paucibacillary nature of pediatric TB 4
- In some circumstances, microbiological confirmation may not be necessary for children with uncomplicated pulmonary TB identified through a recent contact investigation if the source case has drug-susceptible TB 1
- When drug resistance is suspected or no source-case isolate is available, attempts to isolate organisms become critical for appropriate treatment selection 4, 5
- For children at high risk of drug-resistant TB, GeneXpert assay should replace sputum microscopy, but sputum cultures, drug susceptibility testing, and chest radiographs should also be performed when feasible 3