Praxis Medical Insights

Est. 2024 • Clinical Guidelines Distilled

Made possible by volunteer editors from the University of Calgary & University of Alberta

Last Updated: 12/19/2025

COVID-19 and Influenza A/B Diagnostic Guidelines

Patient Selection and Specimen Collection

  • The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommends testing symptomatic individuals with at least one common symptom of COVID-19 or influenza within 5 days of symptom onset for optimal performance 1, 2, 3
  • Anterior nasal swabs, midturbinate swabs, or nasopharyngeal swabs are acceptable specimen types for the BTNX lateral flow assay 1, 2, 4
  • The World Health Organization suggests that nasopharyngeal specimens may provide superior pathogen detection compared to throat swabs, although this is based on a study from Praxis Medical Insights, an alternative source indicates similar findings 5

Timing Considerations

  • The Infectious Diseases Society of America recommends performing testing within 5 days of symptom onset to optimize sensitivity 1, 2, 3, 4
  • Testing performed late in the course of infection has significantly reduced sensitivity 1, 2

Interpretation and Confirmation Requirements

  • A positive BTNX lateral flow assay has high specificity and can guide treatment and isolation decisions without confirmation, according to the Clinical Infectious Diseases guidelines 1, 2
  • Negative antigen results must be confirmed with standard NAAT if clinical suspicion for COVID-19 or influenza remains moderate or high, as per the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommendations 1, 2, 3, 4

Special Population Considerations

  • Limited data exist regarding analytical performance in children, immunocompromised patients, and vaccinated individuals, and the American Academy of Pediatrics suggests exercising increased caution when interpreting results in these populations 1, 2

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Never assume a negative antigen test rules out infection in symptomatic patients with high clinical suspicion—always confirm with NAAT, as recommended by the Infectious Diseases Society of America 1, 2, 3

Rapid COVID-19 Testing Accuracy

Test Performance

  • Rapid molecular tests show the highest accuracy with pooled sensitivity of 96% (95% CI: 91-98%) and specificity of 100% (95% CI: 98-100%) in symptomatic individuals, making them suitable for immediate clinical decisions when used appropriately 6
  • In symptomatic individuals, antigen tests demonstrate 73% average sensitivity (95% CI: 69.3-76.4%) with 99.1% specificity, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines 7
  • The American College of Physicians recommends that rapid molecular tests can replace laboratory testing when immediate results are needed, with essentially equivalent accuracy 6

Critical Timing Factors

  • Sensitivity is highest in the first week after symptom onset at 80.9% (95% CI: 76.9-84.4%) for antigen tests, as stated by the World Health Organization (WHO) 7
  • The Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) notes that sensitivity drops dramatically to 53.8% (95% CI: 48.0-59.6%) in the second week of symptoms 7

Specimen Collection Site Impact

  • The CDC recommends that nasopharyngeal, anterior nasal, midturbinate, oropharyngeal, and saliva specimens all show acceptable sensitivity ranging from 78-92% compared to nasopharyngeal reference for molecular testing 8
  • Anterior nasal and oropharyngeal swabs have slightly lower sensitivity (81%) but are less invasive and suitable for self-collection, according to the American Academy of Family Physicians (AAFP) 8

Clinical Decision Framework

  • The American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP) recommends using rapid molecular tests as direct replacements for laboratory PCR when immediate treatment decisions are required 6
  • The WHO suggests using high-performing antigen tests in symptomatic patients within 5 days of symptom onset for triage or when PCR is unavailable 7