Cyproheptadine as an Appetite Stimulant in Specific Populations
Evidence-Based Recommendations
- The European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism (ESPEN) and the European Society for Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition (ESPGHAN) and the European Cystic Fibrosis Society (ECFS) guidelines note moderate-grade evidence for cyproheptadine's effect on weight and BMI z-scores in cystic fibrosis patients 1, 2, 3
- The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) 2020 guidelines state that cyproheptadine lacks sufficient benefit and has insufficient evidence for cancer-related cachexia, recommending megestrol acetate and corticosteroids instead 4
- The French National Federation of Cancer Centres (FNCLCC) 2003 guidelines state that cyproheptadine may be an appetite stimulant, but adverse effects have been reported, with only Level C evidence, recommending its use only in clinical trials 5
- The ESPEN 2015 dementia guidelines explicitly state that systematic use of appetite stimulants, including cyproheptadine, is not recommended in dementia patients, with very low grade evidence 6
- Cyproheptadine has a more favorable side-effect profile than megestrol acetate, which carries risks of thromboembolic events, edema, and adrenal suppression, according to the ASCO 2020 guidelines 4
Clinical Decision Making
- The ESPEN, ESPGHAN, and ECFS guidelines recommend considering cyproheptadine as a first-line treatment for cystic fibrosis patients with poor appetite and suboptimal nutritional status 1, 2, 3
- The ASCO 2020 guidelines recommend avoiding cyproheptadine in cancer cachexia and using megestrol acetate or corticosteroids instead 4
- The ESPEN 2015 guidelines recommend avoiding systematic use of cyproheptadine in dementia patients due to insufficient evidence and better alternatives 6