Praxis Medical Insights

Est. 2024 • Clinical Guidelines Distilled

Made possible by volunteer editors from the University of Calgary & University of Alberta

Last Updated: 9/4/2025

Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Vedolizumab and IL-23 Inhibitors for IBD

Efficacy Comparison

  • The American Gastroenterological Association recommends vedolizumab as the preferred first-line biologic therapy for moderate-to-severe inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) due to its established long-term safety profile and strong evidence supporting its efficacy in both ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease 1, 2, 3
  • Vedolizumab is recommended for induction and maintenance of remission in ulcerative colitis with strong evidence 2, 3
  • Long-term data shows that 83% of responders to vedolizumab remained in remission after 2 years and 89% after 3 years 4
  • Real-world effectiveness of vedolizumab is demonstrated in observational studies with steroid-free remission rates of 28.6-54% at one year 4
  • Vedolizumab is particularly effective in patients with Crohn's disease duration ≤2 years 4
  • Risankizumab and guselkumab are strongly recommended for moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis 2
  • Mirikizumab is conditionally recommended for moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis 2
  • Clinical remission rates with risankizumab in ulcerative colitis are 18.5% vs 6.2% for placebo 5
  • Clinical remission rates with mirikizumab in ulcerative colitis are 24.1% vs 11.8% for placebo 5
  • Risankizumab shows efficacy in Crohn's disease with clinical remission rates of 51.8% vs 39.6% for placebo at week 52 1

Safety Profile Comparison

  • Vedolizumab has a lower risk of serious infections compared to TNF antagonists (32% reduction in ulcerative colitis patients) 3
  • IL-23 inhibitors are generally well-tolerated but have less long-term safety data compared to vedolizumab 5
  • Ustekinumab (IL-12/23 inhibitor) shows a 51% lower risk of serious infections compared to TNF antagonists in Crohn's disease 3

Clinical Decision Algorithm

  • For patients with moderate-to-severe IBD, vedolizumab is preferred due to its established long-term safety profile and gut-selective mechanism 2, 3, 4
  • IL-23 inhibitors should be considered when patients have failed vedolizumab therapy or have extraintestinal manifestations that may benefit from systemic immunomodulation 2, 5

Special Considerations

  • Vedolizumab remains effective in patients who have failed anti-TNF therapy, although response rates are somewhat lower compared to anti-TNF naïve patients 4
  • Vedolizumab shows higher response rates in Crohn's disease of ≤2 years duration 4
  • Subcutaneous vedolizumab is available as maintenance therapy with comparable efficacy to IV formulation, offering greater convenience 5