Praxis Medical Insights

Est. 2024 • Clinical Guidelines Distilled

Made possible by volunteer editors from the University of Calgary & University of Alberta

Last Updated: 1/23/2026

Total Neoadjuvant Therapy for Rectal Cancer

Definition and Components

  • Total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) is the preferred treatment approach for stage II-III locally advanced rectal cancer, particularly for patients with lower rectal tumors and/or high-risk features for local or distant metastases, as recommended by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network 1, 2
  • TNT delivers both chemoradiotherapy and systemic chemotherapy before surgery, representing a paradigm shift from the traditional approach of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy, according to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network 3, 4

Evidence-Based Benefits

  • Higher chemotherapy compliance rates are observed with TNT compared to adjuvant therapy, as reported by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network 1, 3

Specific Indications

  • The National Comprehensive Cancer Network and the American Society of Clinical Oncology recommend TNT for patients with lower rectal tumors (requiring potential abdominoperineal resection) 2, 5
  • TNT is recommended for patients with T4 tumors, as suggested by the American Society of Clinical Oncology 6
  • Patients with extramural vascular invasion (EMVI) and/or tumor deposits should be offered TNT, according to the American Society of Clinical Oncology 5
  • The American Society of Clinical Oncology recommends TNT for patients with threatened mesorectal fascia or intersphincteric plane 6
  • Patients not eligible for sphincter-sparing surgery should be considered for TNT, as recommended by the American Society of Clinical Oncology 6
  • Node-positive disease (cN2) is an indication for TNT, according to the American Society of Clinical Oncology 7
  • Enlarged lateral lymph nodes are a high-risk feature that may benefit from TNT, as suggested by the American Society of Clinical Oncology 7

Optimal TNT Regimen Selection

  • Consolidation chemotherapy (after radiation) is the preferred sequence over induction chemotherapy (before radiation), as recommended by the American Society of Clinical Oncology 2, 8
  • The American Society of Clinical Oncology suggests that long-course chemoradiotherapy is preferred over short-course radiotherapy for TNT candidates 2, 8

Special Populations

  • For patients with microsatellite instability-high or mismatch repair-deficient tumors, immunotherapy is the recommended treatment, as suggested by the American Society of Clinical Oncology 2, 9, 5

Potential for Non-Operative Management

  • TNT enables the possibility of avoiding surgery in select patients who achieve a clinical complete response (cCR), as reported by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network and the American Society of Clinical Oncology 1, 3, 2, 8, 6
  • Non-operative management may be discussed as an alternative to total mesorectal excision for patients with cCR, particularly those requiring abdominoperineal resection, according to the American Society of Clinical Oncology 2, 8, 6

Common Pitfalls

  • Thorough staging with pelvic MRI including dedicated rectal sequences is essential before treatment decisions, as recommended by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network and the American Society of Clinical Oncology 1, 3, 2, 9
  • Assessment should include tumor relation to anal verge, sphincter complex, mesorectal fascia, EMVI, and lymph nodes, as suggested by the American Society of Clinical Oncology 2, 9
  • Serious adverse events occur in approximately 38% of patients undergoing TNT, as reported by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network 1, 4
  • Triplet chemotherapy regimens like FOLFIRINOX carry higher toxicity and may be inappropriate for patients with significant comorbidities or advanced age, according to the American Society of Clinical Oncology 8
  • The RAPIDO trial's 5-year follow-up revealed increased locoregional recurrence with short-course RT-based TNT, emphasizing the importance of long-course chemoradiotherapy when local control is paramount, as reported by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network and the American Society of Clinical Oncology 1, 4

Treatment Selection Between NACTRT and SCRT for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer

Introduction to Treatment Options

  • For most patients with locally advanced rectal cancer, long-course neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NACTRT) is preferred over short-course radiotherapy (SCRT) when radiation is included in the treatment plan, primarily due to superior long-term local control 10, 11

Risk-Stratified Treatment Algorithm

  • Patients with high-risk features such as low rectal tumors, T4 tumors, extramural vascular invasion (EMVI) positive, tumor deposits identified on MRI, threatened mesorectal fascia (MRF+), threatened intersphincteric plane, cN2 disease, or enlarged lateral lymph nodes should receive total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) with long-course chemoradiotherapy rather than SCRT 10, 12, 13
  • The Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology recommends that high-risk patients should receive consolidation chemotherapy after SCRT rather than immediate surgery 14

Evidence Supporting Long-Course CRT Over SCRT

  • The RAPIDO trial's 5-year follow-up data revealed that short-course RT-based TNT resulted in 10% locoregional failure compared to 6% with standard long-course chemoradiotherapy (RR 1.45, 95% CI 0.97-2.17) 15, 16
  • Long-course chemoradiotherapy followed by consolidation chemotherapy is the preferred TNT regimen because it provides superior local control while maintaining the systemic benefits of total neoadjuvant therapy 10, 11, 12

Critical Pre-Treatment Assessment Requirements

  • Before making the NACTRT versus SCRT decision, all patients must undergo high-resolution pelvic MRI with dedicated rectal sequence, standardized synoptic MRI reporting, and MSI/MMR status assessment 10, 12, 13, 17

Outcomes Comparison

  • TNT with long-course CRT demonstrates superior survival outcomes compared to standard neoadjuvant CRT alone, with a 5-year overall survival HR of 0.78 (95% CI 0.62-0.97) and a pathologic complete response rate of 22.4% versus 14.3% with standard CRT 15, 16

Toxicity Considerations

  • Long-course chemoradiotherapy has a more favorable acute toxicity profile compared to SCRT-based TNT, with a lower rate of grade 3+ toxicity during neoadjuvant therapy (35.9% vs 23%) 12, 15, 16

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Do not select treatment based solely on radiographic nodal assessment (cN stage) as clinical lymph node staging has limited accuracy, instead use the constellation of MRI risk factors 10, 13
  • Do not use SCRT for patients seeking organ preservation/watch-and-wait approaches, as long-course chemoradiotherapy is more appropriate when the goal is achieving clinical complete response for potential non-operative management 10, 11
  • Do not prescribe concurrent targeted agents with SCRT, as the Chinese guidelines explicitly recommend against concurrent use of chemotherapy drugs and targeted drugs with short-course radiotherapy 14

Total Neoadjuvant Therapy for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer

Introduction to Total Neoadjuvant Therapy

  • Total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) using long-course chemoradiotherapy followed by consolidation XELOX (capecitabine and oxaliplatin) is the preferred treatment approach for locally advanced rectal cancer, particularly for patients with high-risk features, as it significantly improves pathologic complete response rates, disease-free survival, and facilitates better chemotherapy compliance compared to standard neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy alone, according to the American Society of Clinical Oncology 18, 19

High-Risk Indications for TNT

  • TNT with long-course CCRT and XELOX is specifically recommended for patients with T4 tumors (invasion through rectal wall into adjacent organs/structures) 19

Evidence-Based Treatment Approaches for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer

Guideline-Based Recommendations for Total Neoadjuvant Therapy (TNT)

  • The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) recommends that for patients who are candidates for total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT), chemotherapy should be delivered after radiation (consolidation) rather than before (induction), with conditional strength based on moderate-quality evidence 20, 21
  • The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) recommends that neoadjuvant long-course chemoradiotherapy is preferred over short-course radiotherapy for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer, based on moderate-quality evidence with conditional strength 20, 21

Postoperative Management

  • Patients receiving preoperative TNT should still undergo postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy, with a recommended total treatment duration of 6 months (including the preoperative consolidation period) 22
  • For patients with pathological stage ≤ypII after preoperative TNT, fluoropyrimidine monotherapy may be considered following thorough patient communication 22
  • Postoperative adjuvant treatment should start as early as possible and no later than 8 weeks after surgery 22

Toxicity Management and Treatment Selection

  • The Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology explicitly recommends against concurrent use of bevacizumab or cetuximab with rectal cancer radiotherapy outside of clinical trials, as these agents have shown poor efficacy outcomes and excessive surgical complications 22
  • Triplet chemotherapy regimens like FOLFIRINOX carry higher toxicity (grade 3+ toxicity 35.9% vs 23% with doublet regimens) and may be inappropriate for patients with significant comorbidities or advanced age (>76 years) 20

Total Neoadjuvant Therapy for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer

Introduction to Total Neoadjuvant Therapy

  • The American Society of Clinical Oncology recommends that for patients who are candidates for total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT), chemotherapy should be delivered after radiation (consolidation) rather than before (induction), with conditional strength based on moderate-quality evidence 23
  • Long-course chemoradiotherapy is preferred over short-course radiotherapy for TNT candidates, based on moderate-quality evidence 23

Pathologic Complete Response Rates

  • The CAO/ARO/AIO-12 phase II randomized trial demonstrated that consolidation chemotherapy achieved a 25% pathologic complete response rate compared to the expected 15% rate with standard conventional chemoradiotherapy alone, meeting its predefined statistical hypothesis 23
  • The CAO/ARO/AIO-12 trial definitively established that chemoradiotherapy followed by consolidation chemotherapy is superior to induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiotherapy for achieving pathologic complete response (25% vs 17%) 23

Local Control Advantages

  • The RAPIDO trial's 5-year follow-up revealed critical differences in locoregional control: short-course radiotherapy-based TNT resulted in 10% locoregional failure versus 6% with standard long-course chemoradiotherapy (P = 0.027) 23
  • This compares favorably to the PRODIGE-23 trial's 5-year locoregional recurrence rate of 4.7% with FOLFIRINOX followed by long-course chemoradiotherapy 23

Treatment Sequence and Timing

  • The typical regimen consists of fluorouracil/oxaliplatin-based chemoradiotherapy (50.4 Gy) followed by 3 cycles of FOLFOX or similar chemotherapy before surgery 23
  • Do not use short-course radiotherapy for patients with high-risk features requiring optimal local control, as the RAPIDO trial demonstrated increased locoregional recurrence (10% vs 6%) with this approach 23

Post‑Total Neoadjuvant Therapy (TNT) Restaging and Management in Rectal Adenocarcinoma

Timing of Restaging Assessment

  • Wait 6–8 weeks after completing TNT before any restaging studies; this interval permits maximal tumor regression and yields the most accurate assessment of treatment response. 24

Required Restaging Evaluation

  • Perform high‑resolution pelvic MRI with dedicated rectal sequences together with endoscopic examination (digital rectal exam + proctoscopy) as the standard of care for post‑TNT restaging. 24
  • Apply standardized reporting criteria on MRI to categorize response as clinical complete response (cCR), near‑complete response, or incomplete response. 25
  • Combine MRI with endoscopy because MRI alone detects complete response with only ~64 % accuracy; the combined approach provides optimal assessment. 25
  • Include serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) measurement and systemic imaging for distant metastases during the restaging work‑up. 24

Management Based on Response Assessment

Clinical Complete Response (cCR) – Organ Preservation (Watch‑and‑Wait)

  • Patients with documented cCR on both MRI and endoscopy may be offered a non‑operative watch‑and‑wait strategy as an alternative to total mesorectal excision, especially when surgery would otherwise require a permanent colostomy. 25
  • The OPRA trial demonstrated 3‑year TME‑free survival of 41–53 % and 5‑year disease‑free survival of 69–71 % with organ‑preservation approaches. 25
  • 94–99 % of tumor regrowth occurs within the first 2 years; therefore, intensive surveillance with MRI and endoscopy every 3–4 months is required during this period. 25

Near‑Complete Response (ycT1) – Transanal Local Excision

  • For tumors down‑staged to ycT1 (near‑complete response), transanal local excision can be considered to avoid radical surgery while preserving oncologic outcomes. 26
  • If pathology after local excision shows high‑risk features (poor differentiation, vascular invasion, positive margins, or deeper invasion than anticipated), salvage radical surgery must be performed. 26

Incomplete Response (ycT2 or Greater) – Radical Surgery

  • Patients with incomplete or insufficient response should undergo radical surgery with total mesorectal excision (TME). 26
  • Schedule surgery 6–8 weeks after TNT completion to balance maximal regression with avoidance of excessive delay that could permit tumor regrowth. 26
  • Laparoscopic or robotic‑assisted TME is acceptable in experienced centers, although long‑term oncologic outcomes are still being evaluated. 26
  • For mid‑ to low‑rectal cancers, standard TME is required; for upper rectal cancers, a wide mesorectal excision of ≥5 cm is recommended. 26

Postoperative Adjuvant Therapy Considerations

  • After surgery following TNT, complete a total of 6 months of systemic chemotherapy (including the pre‑operative consolidation phase). 27
  • Patients with pathologic complete response (ypT0N0) have a 10‑year distant metastasis rate of ~10.5 % and a disease‑free survival of ~89.5 %, indicating excellent prognosis even without additional adjuvant therapy, though guidelines still suggest considering adjuvant treatment. 27

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Do not perform restaging immediately after TNT; adhere to the 6–8 week interval for accurate evaluation. 24
  • Do not rely on MRI alone for determining complete response; endoscopic confirmation is mandatory. 25
  • Do not offer watch‑and‑wait to patients lacking documented cCR on both MRI and endoscopy. 25
  • Do not delay definitive surgery beyond 8–10 weeks after TNT in patients who require resection, to prevent tumor regrowth. 26

Total Neoadjuvant Therapy (TNT) for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer

Standard TNT Schedule

  • The recommended TNT protocol for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer consists of long‑course chemoradiotherapy delivering 50.4 Gy over 5–6 weeks with concurrent fluoropyrimidine, followed by 3–4 cycles of consolidation chemotherapy (FOLFOX or CAPOX), and definitive surgery performed 6–8 weeks after the completion of all neoadjuvant treatment. This schedule is endorsed by the American Society of Clinical Oncology based on recent phase III data. 28

Radiation Sequence Preference

  • Long‑course chemoradiotherapy is strongly preferred to short‑course radiotherapy for TNT candidates; the RAPIDO trial’s 5‑year follow‑up demonstrated a locoregional recurrence rate of 6 % with long‑course CRT versus 10 % with short‑course RT (P = 0.027). The NCCN guidelines cite this evidence when recommending long‑course CRT as the standard radiation approach. [28][29]

Chemotherapy Timing

  • Consolidation chemotherapy administered after radiation is recommended over induction chemotherapy given before radiation. Moderate‑quality evidence indicates that this sequence improves treatment compliance and yields higher pathologic complete response (pCR) rates. The NCCN guideline panel highlights this preference. 28
  • In the CAO/ARO/AIO‑12 randomized trial, pCR was achieved in 25 % of patients receiving consolidation chemotherapy versus 17 % in those receiving induction chemotherapy, supporting the superiority of the consolidation strategy. 29

High‑Risk Patient Considerations

  • For patients at highest risk of distant metastasis, induction with a triplet regimen (FOLFIRINOX: fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, irinotecan) may be considered. This recommendation is based on data from the PRODIGE‑23 trial and other phase III studies reported by the American Society of Clinical Oncology. [28][30]
  • The PRODIGE‑23 trial restricted eligibility to patients younger than 76 years because of increased toxicity with the triplet regimen, a safety consideration incorporated into NCCN recommendations for this subgroup. 28

Short‑Course Radiotherapy‑Based TNT (Non‑Standard)

  • When short‑course radiotherapy (25 Gy in 5 fractions over 1 week) is employed, it must be followed by consolidation chemotherapy before surgery. This sequence is outlined in the NCCN guideline as an alternative for patients who cannot tolerate long‑course CRT. 29
  • Short‑course RT‑based TNT is associated with a higher risk of locoregional recurrence and is therefore reserved for selected scenarios (e.g., elderly patients, severe comorbidities, or logistical constraints) per NCCN guidance. 29

Avoid Adding Oxaliplatin or Targeted Agents to Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy in T4 Rectal Adenocarcinoma

Chemoradiotherapy Recommendations

  • The NCCN guideline advises against the inclusion of oxaliplatin, bevacizumab, cetuximab, or panitumumab in the concurrent chemoradiotherapy regimen for medically fit adults with T4 rectal adenocarcinoma, because these agents increase treatment‑related toxicity without providing a survival advantage and may lead to higher rates of surgical complications. (Guideline recommendation, Level 2A) 31

Standard Neoadjuvant and Concurrent Therapy for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer in Patients with Moderate Renal Impairment

Total Neoadjuvant Therapy (TNT)

  • In adults with locally advanced rectal cancer (T3‑4, N+, multiple lesions) and eGFR 30–40 mL/min/1.73 m², a total neoadjuvant therapy approach—long‑course chemoradiotherapy followed by consolidation chemotherapy—is recommended as the standard treatment strategy【32】.

Radiotherapy Regimen Selection

  • For the same patient group, long‑course chemoradiotherapy delivering 50.4 Gy with concurrent fluoropyrimidine provides superior local control compared with short‑course radiotherapy (5‑year locoregional failure 6 % vs 10 %; P = 0.027)【32】.

Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy (CRT) Agent Choice

  • Guidelines explicitly advise using fluoropyrimidine monotherapy (capecitabine or continuous‑infusion 5‑FU) without oxaliplatin, bevacizumab, or cetuximab during CRT, because adding these agents increases toxicity without any survival benefit and may worsen renal function【32】.

Monitoring Schedule During Neoadjuvant Therapy

  • Serum creatinine and electrolyte concentrations should be measured weekly throughout the 6‑week concurrent CRT phase to promptly detect acute kidney injury【32】.
  • After completion of the entire neoadjuvant course, these labs should be checked monthly until definitive surgery to ensure renal recovery before operative planning【32】.

Prohibited Additions to Concurrent CRT

  • Adding oxaliplatin, bevacizumab, or cetuximab to the concurrent fluoropyrimidine‑based CRT regimen is contraindicated, as it raises toxicity risk without improving oncologic outcomes and may further impair renal function【32】.

Total Neoadjuvant Therapy for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer

Efficacy of Total Neoadjuvant Therapy (TNT)

  • TNT achieves higher chemotherapy completion (≈ 90 % vs 50‑60 % with adjuvant therapy), greater pathologic complete response (pCR) rates (22‑25 % vs 14‑15 % with chemoradiotherapy alone), and improved disease‑free survival compared with standard approaches. 33

Pre‑Treatment Staging Requirements

  • High‑resolution pelvic MRI with dedicated rectal sequences is required to evaluate tumor distance from the anal verge, sphincter involvement, mesorectal fascia, extramural vascular invasion, and nodal status before any therapy. 33
  • Approximately 22 % of clinically staged T3N0 patients harbor occult nodal metastases on final pathology, supporting the use of neoadjuvant therapy even when imaging shows no nodes. 34

Long‑Course Chemoradiotherapy (LCCRT) Details

  • LCCRT delivers 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions (1.8 Gy per fraction) over 5‑6 weeks with concurrent fluoropyrimidine (continuous‑infusion 5‑FU 225 mg/m²/day or oral capecitabine 825 mg/m² twice daily on radiation days). Oxaliplatin, bevacizumab, or cetuximab should not be added because they increase toxicity without survival benefit. [33][35]

Consolidation Chemotherapy

  • After LCCRT, 3‑4 cycles of FOLFOX (5‑FU, leucovorin, oxaliplatin) or CAPOX (capecitabine, oxaliplatin) are administered before surgery to complete TNT. 33

Surgical Management (Total Mesorectal Excision, TME)

  • TME must be performed by an experienced colorectal surgeon 6‑8 weeks after completing all neoadjuvant treatment to allow maximal tumor regression. [33][35]
  • The procedure requires sharp dissection along the avascular plane between the mesorectal fascia and presacral fascia, achieving negative circumferential resection margins (≥ 1 mm clearance). 33
  • For mid‑ to low‑rectal cancers, standard TME is indicated; for upper rectal cancers, a partial mesorectal excision with a distal mesorectal margin of ≥ 5 cm is acceptable. 33
  • Laparoscopic or robotic‑assisted TME may be performed by skilled surgeons, but some data indicate higher rates of positive circumferential margins and incomplete TME compared with open surgery. 34

Restaging and Organ‑Preservation Considerations

  • Restaging MRI and endoscopic evaluation should be performed 6‑8 weeks after TNT to capture maximal tumor regression. If both modalities demonstrate a clinical complete response, a watch‑and‑wait strategy can be offered as an alternative to immediate surgery. 33

Post‑TNT Adjuvant Therapy

  • After surgery, the total duration of systemic chemotherapy (including the pre‑operative consolidation cycles) should reach six months. 34
  • Short‑course radiotherapy (5 × 5 Gy) should not be used for tumors of this size because it yields inferior local control compared with long‑course chemoradiotherapy. 33
  • Immediate surgery after chemoradiotherapy is discouraged; a 6‑8‑week interval is essential for optimal tumor regression and accurate response assessment. 33
  • Reliance on MRI alone to declare complete response is insufficient; endoscopic confirmation is mandatory before considering a non‑operative approach. 33
  • Definitive surgery should not be delayed beyond 8‑10 weeks after TNT to avoid tumor regrowth. 33
  • Pre‑operative therapy must not be omitted even when nodes appear negative on imaging, given the 22 % rate of occult nodal disease in clinically staged T3N0 patients. 34

Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy and Total Mesorectal Excision for cT3bN1 Rectal Cancer with Left‑Sided Pelvic Lymph Node Metastasis

Standard Treatment Recommendation

  • For cT3bN1 rectal cancer with confirmed left‑sided pelvic lymph node involvement, the recommended approach is neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by total mesorectal excision (TME) surgery; surgery or radiotherapy alone is not advised. 36, 37

Treatment Sequencing (Total Neoadjuvant Therapy)

  • The optimal sequence consists of long‑course chemoradiotherapy (total dose 50.4 Gy with concurrent fluoropyrimidine), then consolidation chemotherapy with 3–4 cycles of FOLFOX or CAPOX, and finally TME surgery performed 6–8 weeks after completion of all neoadjuvant therapy. 38, 37

Radiotherapy Parameters

  • Deliver 45.0–50.4 Gy to the pelvis in 25–28 fractions (1.8–2.0 Gy per fraction). 38, 36
  • The radiation field must encompass the primary tumor with a 2–5 cm margin and include the presacral, internal iliac, and obturator lymph‑node regions. 38
  • When a T3 tumor shows lateral extension on the left side, the external iliac lymph nodes should also be included in the treatment field. 38

Concurrent Chemotherapy Regimen

  • Concurrent chemotherapy should be either continuous‑infusion 5‑fluorouracil (≈225 mg/m²/day) or oral capecitabine (≈825 mg/m² twice daily on days of radiotherapy, 5 days per week). 38, 36, 37

Surgical Requirements

  • TME surgery is performed 6–8 weeks after the completion of the full neoadjuvant regimen to allow maximal tumor regression. 37, 39
  • The operation must achieve a negative circumferential resection margin (≥1 mm clearance) and retrieve at least 12 regional lymph nodes for pathological assessment. 37, 39

Management of Lateral Pelvic Lymph Nodes (LPLNs)

  • For imaging‑confirmed left‑sided pelvic lymph‑node metastasis, initiate neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy first and reassess after treatment. 40
  • If the involved node disappears on post‑treatment imaging, observation without lateral lymph‑node dissection is acceptable. 40
  • Prophylactic lateral lymph‑node dissection is not recommended when there is no imaging evidence of metastasis. 40

Adjuvant Systemic Therapy

  • The total duration of systemic chemotherapy should be six months, counting both the pre‑operative consolidation cycles and any postoperative courses. 37

Contraindicated Practices

  • Surgery without preceding neoadjuvant therapy for T3N1 disease leads to significantly higher local‑recurrence rates and should be avoided. 41, 36
  • Short‑course radiotherapy (5 × 5 Gy) provides inferior locoregional control compared with long‑course chemoradiotherapy (10 % vs 6 % recurrence at 5 years) and is not recommended for this presentation. 37

REFERENCES

1

nccn guidelines® insights: rectal cancer, version 3.2024. [LINK]

Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN, 2024

3

nccn guidelines® insights: rectal cancer, version 3.2024. [LINK]

Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN, 2024

4

nccn guidelines® insights: rectal cancer, version 3.2024. [LINK]

Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN, 2024

24
25

nccn guidelines® insights: rectal cancer, version 3.2024. [LINK]

Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN, 2024

27

rectal cancer, version 2.2018, nccn clinical practice guidelines in oncology. [LINK]

Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN, 2018

29

nccn guidelines® insights: rectal cancer, version 3.2024. [LINK]

Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN, 2024

31

rectal cancer, version 2.2018, nccn clinical practice guidelines in oncology. [LINK]

Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN, 2018

34

rectal cancer, version 2.2018, nccn clinical practice guidelines in oncology. [LINK]

Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN, 2018

41

cancer of the rectum. [LINK]

British Journal of Cancer, 2001