Praxis Medical Insights

Est. 2024 • Clinical Guidelines Distilled

Made possible by volunteer editors from the University of Calgary & University of Alberta

Last Updated: 9/3/2025

Etiology and Pathophysiology of Malignant Ascites

  • The American Society of Clinical Oncology notes that gastric cancer peritoneal metastasis is a significant cause of malignant ascites, accounting for between one-fifth and three-fifths of all metastatic recurrences after gastrectomy 2
  • Lobular breast cancer has a unique propensity to metastasize to the peritoneum, similar to gastric cancer, due to specific molecular characteristics 1
  • Epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) is a critical process where epithelial cells transform into a mesenchymal phenotype with increased migratory and invasive capabilities, according to the American Association for Cancer Research 1
  • Primary gastric tumors of the EMT subtype develop peritoneal metastasis more frequently and have worse prognosis compared to non-EMT subtypes 1

Genomic Drivers and Paracrine Factors

  • The National Comprehensive Cancer Network states that TP53 mutations occur at similar rates in peritoneal metastases as in primary tumors, while CDH1 mutations are more frequent, particularly in diffuse-type gastric cancers 1, 4
  • Novel drivers such as PIGR and SOX9 have been identified in tumor cells derived from malignant ascites, as reported by the American Society of Clinical Oncology 1, 4
  • Malignant ascites contains various growth factors, cytokines, chemokines, and other soluble factors that create a tumorigenic environment, according to the European Association for the Study of the Liver 1, 6

Diagnostic Considerations

  • The American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases recommends that ascitic fluid cytology is positive only in the setting of peritoneal carcinomatosis with a sensitivity of 96.7% if three samples are sent and processed promptly 8, 9
  • The first cytology sample is positive in 82.8% of cases and at least one of two samples is positive in 93.3%, as stated by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases 8