Off‑Label Use of Empagliflozin for Heart Failure in Patients Without Diabetes
Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction (HFrEF)
- Empagliflozin 10 mg daily significantly lowers the composite of cardiovascular death or hospitalization for worsening heart failure by 21 % (hazard ratio 0.79, 95 % CI 0.69–0.90) in NYHA class II–IV patients with left‑ventricular ejection fraction ≤ 40 %【1】.
- The benefit is observed in both diabetic and non‑diabetic participants; roughly half of the EMPEROR‑Reduced cohort had type 2 diabetes, demonstrating efficacy in patients without diabetes【1】.
- Across the EMPEROR‑Reduced trial, empagliflozin reduced cardiovascular mortality and heart‑failure hospitalizations regardless of diabetes status, confirming a robust off‑label indication【2】【3】.
Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction (HFpEF)
- In the EMPEROR‑Preserved trial, empagliflozin reduced the risk of cardiovascular death or heart‑failure hospitalization by 21 % (HR 0.79, 95 % CI 0.69–0.90) in patients with LVEF > 40 %【2】【3】.
- The study enrolled 5,988 adults with NYHA class I–IV chronic HFpEF; about 50 % had type 2 diabetes, indicating the effect extends to non‑diabetic patients【2】.
- The therapeutic benefit was consistent irrespective of baseline diabetes diagnosis, supporting its use off‑label in HFpEF without diabetes【2】【3】.
Evidence Across the Heart‑Failure Spectrum
- A meta‑analysis of five large SGLT2‑inhibitor trials (EMPEROR‑Reduced, EMPEROR‑Preserved, DAPA‑HF, DELIVER, SOLOIST‑WHF) comprising 21,947 participants showed significant reductions in:
- cardiovascular death or heart‑failure hospitalization,
- cardiovascular death alone,
- first heart‑failure hospitalization, and
- all‑cause mortality【4】【2】.
- These pooled data confirm that SGLT2 inhibition lowers the risk of heart‑failure hospitalization and cardiovascular death across a wide range of heart‑failure phenotypes, independent of diabetes status【4】【2】.
Dosing for Off‑Label Heart‑Failure Indication
- The recommended regimen for heart‑failure benefit is empagliflozin 10 mg taken orally once daily, which is the lowest dose proven effective in cardiovascular outcome trials【5】.
- No dose escalation is required to achieve cardiovascular or heart‑failure risk reduction【5】.
- Renal‑function‑based adjustments: the drug is not advised for glycaemic control when eGFR < 45 mL/min/1.73 m² and is contraindicated in patients on dialysis or with severe renal impairment【5】.
Safety Considerations
Diabetic Ketoacidosis (DKA)
- SGLT2 inhibitors increase susceptibility to DKA, including euglycaemic presentations, especially in contexts such as insulin‑pump malfunction, substantial insulin dose reductions, or prolonged fasting【6】.
Volume Depletion
- Empagliflozin induces osmotic diuresis, which can lead to intravascular volume contraction; clinicians should consider reducing or pausing concomitant diuretics when initiating therapy, particularly in older adults (≥ 65 years), patients on low‑sodium diets, those with renal impairment, or those already receiving diuretics【5】.
Genitourinary Infections
- Use is associated with a higher incidence of genital mycotic infections and urinary‑tract infections【5】.
Contraindications
- Empagliflozin is contraindicated in individuals with hypersensitivity to the drug, patients receiving dialysis, and during pregnancy or lactation【5】.
Empagliflozin for Prevention of Progression in Subclinical HFpEF
Guideline Recommendations
- The 2025 Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) guidelines give a Class I recommendation for SGLT2‑inhibitor therapy in patients with heart failure with non‑reduced ejection fraction (HFnrEF), encompassing early diastolic dysfunction and concentric left‑ventricular hypertrophy. 7
- The 2022 Canadian guideline on structural heart disease advises early integration of SGLT2 inhibitors into cardiovascular management for patients with objective cardiac remodeling but no symptoms. 8
Efficacy in Early Heart‑Failure Phenotypes
- In adults with cardiovascular risk factors or early structural heart disease, empagliflozin reduces the incidence of symptomatic heart failure compared with usual care. Evidence comes from a 2022 Diabetes Care trial and a 2021 Canadian cardiology study. [9][10]
- The EMPEROR‑Preserved randomized trial showed that empagliflozin decreases the composite of cardiovascular death or heart‑failure hospitalization by 21 % in patients with left‑ventricular ejection fraction > 40 %, independent of diabetes status. 7
- The treatment benefit was consistent across the entire spectrum of ejection fractions, supporting use even before any decline in LVEF occurs. Data from the 2025 CCS report and a 2024 Diabetes Care analysis confirm this uniform effect. [7][11]
Hemodynamic and Direct Cardiac Effects
- Empagliflozin produces a modest afterload reduction, lowering systolic blood pressure by an average of ~2 mm Hg, which lessens the workload of a hypertrophied left ventricle. 7
- The drug exerts anti‑inflammatory and antifibrotic actions that contribute to reverse cardiac remodeling, including reductions in myocardial fibrosis and left‑ventricular mass. 7
- Empagliflozin improves endothelial function and attenuates oxidative stress, addressing vascular contributors to diastolic dysfunction. 7
Safety Profile
- The most frequent adverse event is genital mycotic infection, occurring in roughly 10–15 % of women (lower in men); these infections are usually managed with topical antifungals without stopping therapy. 10
- Volume‑depletion symptoms (e.g., orthostatic dizziness) are generally mild; clinicians should monitor patients, especially those also receiving diuretics or low‑sodium diets. 10
- A temporary decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate of up to ~15 % may be observed during the first 1–3 months, typically resolving as a hemodynamic adaptation rather than true kidney injury. 10
Clinical Context
- Preventive cardiology at the structural‑heart‑disease stage involves initiating disease‑modifying therapy after objective evidence of remodeling (e.g., concentric hypertrophy, grade 1 diastolic dysfunction) but before symptom onset; this approach aligns with the 2025 CCS recommendation for HFnrEF. [7][8]
All statements are derived from cited peer‑reviewed sources and reflect the strength of evidence as reported in the original references.