Praxis Medical Insights

Est. 2024 • Clinical Guidelines Distilled

Made possible by volunteer editors from the University of Calgary & University of Alberta

Last Updated: 9/11/2025

Olfactory Function Evaluation

Methods of Olfactory Evaluation

  • The American Academy of Otolaryngology recommends using psychophysical methods, which include threshold and suprathreshold tests, to evaluate olfactory function 1, 2
  • Threshold tests detect the minimum concentration of an odorant that can be perceived by a subject, commonly using substances like phenylethylamine or n-butanol 2, 3
  • Suprathreshold tests include odor identification and discrimination tests, using concentrations much higher than the threshold 2, 3

Clinical Considerations

  • The American Rhinologic Society suggests that patients with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) often present with olfactory impairment but may not be fully aware of their deficit 4
  • It is recommended to evaluate olfactory function both subjectively and objectively in patients with CRS 4
  • Olfactory tests can be useful during follow-up of patients with CRS, primarily to monitor the outcomes of anti-inflammatory or surgical treatment 4

Selection of Tests

  • The European Rhinologic Society recommends using standardized psychophysical tests with a sufficient number of odors to obtain significant results 1, 2
  • Short tests with fewer odors may reduce cost and time but introduce a degree of unreliability and should only be used for screening purposes 1, 2

Complementary Evaluation

  • Rigid nasal endoscopy can differentiate between possible causes of inflammatory olfactory loss 2, 3
  • If the subjective and psychophysical level of olfactory loss does not correlate with endoscopic findings, it may raise suspicion of a sinonasal or skull base tumor 2, 3
  • MRI or CT scans can exclude olfactory and pituitary tumors and aneurysms 2, 3