Praxis Medical Insights

Est. 2024 • Clinical Guidelines Distilled

Made possible by volunteer editors from the University of Calgary & University of Alberta

Last Updated: 10/28/2025

Fungitell Test Interpretation and ICD-10 Coding

Understanding Fungitell Test Limitations

  • The Fungitell assay has a sensitivity of 75-80% and specificity of approximately 80% for invasive candidiasis, with significant limitations in its ability to detect specific fungal pathogens or infection sites 1, 2
  • The test has a high rate of false positives, particularly in ICU patients, those on hemodialysis, receiving albumin/immunoglobulin products, or on certain antibiotics like piperacillin-tazobactam 4, 5
  • Positive results can occur with multiple fungal pathogens, including Candida, Aspergillus, and Pneumocystis jirovecii 1, 2

Appropriate ICD-10 Coding Strategy

  • The Infectious Diseases Society of America recommends coding the specific fungal infection diagnosed, such as B37.7 for Candida sepsis or B44.0 for invasive pulmonary aspergillosis 1, 6
  • The American College of Chest Physicians suggests using codes for signs/symptoms or suspected infection, such as R50.9 for fever or R65.20 for severe sepsis without septic shock 3, 4

Critical Coding Pitfalls to Avoid

  • The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention advises against coding a fungal infection diagnosis based solely on a positive Fungitell test without supporting clinical, microbiological, or histopathological evidence 1, 2
  • The test should be incorporated into clinical decision-making alongside blood or tissue cultures, clinical risk factors, radiographic findings, and additional biomarkers 1, 2, 4, 6

Documentation Requirements for Proper Coding

  • The medical record should specify clinical presentation, risk factors present, additional diagnostic findings, whether infection is proven, probable, or possible, and treatment decisions made 1, 2, 3, 4, 7