Praxis Medical Insights

Est. 2024 • Clinical Guidelines Distilled

Made possible by volunteer editors from the University of Calgary & University of Alberta

Last Updated: 9/15/2025

Visual Field Assessment and Rehabilitation in Stroke Patients

Visual Field Assessment

  • The NIH Stroke Scale scores visual fields on a 0-3 scale, where 0 = no visual field defect, 1 = partial hemianopia, 2 = complete hemianopia, and 3 = bilateral hemianopia 1, 2, 3
  • A negative visual threat test indicates complete hemianopia, which is scored as 2 on the NIH Stroke Scale 1, 2
  • The visual threat test is used when patients cannot cooperate with formal visual field testing due to aphasia, confusion, or decreased level of consciousness 1

Visual Threat Testing Technique

  • The examiner brings their finger toward the patient's eye from the periphery on each side to perform the visual threat test 1
  • A normal response is for the patient to blink when the finger approaches from either side 1
  • If the patient consistently fails to blink when the finger approaches from one side, this indicates a complete hemianopia on that side 1, 2

Clinical Significance and Implications

  • Complete hemianopia indicates damage to the visual pathway, often from occipital lobe stroke or other posterior circulation lesions 4, 5
  • The presence of complete hemianopia contributes to the overall NIHSS score, which is a strong predictor of stroke outcomes, with higher scores (>20) correlating with poorer outcomes and higher risk of hemorrhagic transformation with thrombolytic treatment 2, 3
  • Patients with complete hemianopia experience difficulties with mobility and navigation 5

Recovery and Rehabilitation

  • Rehabilitation options for patients with complete hemianopia include compensatory scanning strategies and visual search training 5, and occupational therapy focused on adaptation to visual field loss 4, 5
  • Predictors of better adaptation to hemianopia are not well-established, but earlier initiation of visual rehabilitation may be beneficial 4, 5

Common Pitfalls in Assessment

  • Failure to distinguish between hemianopia and visual neglect can lead to inappropriate rehabilitation approaches 5
  • Not recognizing that patients may be unaware of their visual field defect can delay diagnosis and treatment 5