Praxis Medical Insights

Est. 2024 • Clinical Guidelines Distilled

Made possible by volunteer editors from the University of Calgary & University of Alberta

Last Updated: 9/16/2025

Management of Dysarthria

Assessment and Treatment Approaches

  • The American Heart Association recommends that speech and language therapy should be individually tailored to target the specific physiological support systems affected, including respiration, phonation, articulation, and resonance 1, 2
  • Comprehensive evaluation should identify the presence, type, and severity of dysarthria by assessing all components of the motor speech system: respiration, phonation, resonance, articulation, prosody, and overall intelligibility 3
  • Assessment tools should include both auditory-perceptual measures, acoustic measures, and physiological measures 3
  • The Frenchay Dysarthria Assessment is recommended to identify presence and severity of dysarthria by evaluating respiration, phonation, resonation, articulation, and prosody via quantitative tasks and rating scales 4
  • Behavioral management should target physiological support for speech and global aspects of speech production, including loudness, rate, and prosody 2
  • Voice therapy techniques include gentle phonation exercises and postural manipulations to improve voice production, although the source of this information is not preferred 5
  • AAC devices and modalities should be used to supplement speech when intelligibility is severely compromised 2
  • Environmental modifications, including listener education, should be implemented to improve communication effectiveness 2
  • Communication partner training is effective in improving communication activities and participation 1, 6
  • Treatment for dysarthria following stroke should begin as soon as possible during the rehabilitation process 1, 6
  • Regular reassessment of communication abilities should document resolution, improvement, or worsening of symptoms after treatment, although the source of this information is not preferred 5
  • Activities to facilitate social participation and promote psychosocial well-being should be incorporated into the treatment plan 2
  • Delayed diagnosis of underlying conditions can lead to worse outcomes, although the source of this information is not preferred 5
  • The psychosocial impact of motor speech disorders is often disproportionate to the severity of the physiological impairment 2

Mild to Moderate Dysarthria in the NIH Stroke Scale

Characteristics of Mild to Moderate Dysarthria

  • Slurred speech that remains intelligible to the listener 7, 8
  • Noticeable articulation difficulties but words can still be understood 7
  • Patient can read provided word lists with impaired but comprehensible pronunciation 8
  • Speech may sound thickened or imprecise but meaning is preserved 7

Clinical Assessment

  • Assessment should be performed by having the patient read a standardized list of words 7, 8
  • The examiner listens for articulation difficulties while maintaining intelligibility 8
  • Thickened speech quality but words remain recognizable 7

Differential Scoring on NIH Stroke Scale

  • Score 0: Normal articulation with no speech abnormalities 7
  • Score 1: Mild to moderate slurring but speech remains intelligible 7, 8
  • Score 2: Severe dysarthria where speech is unintelligible or patient is mute 7
  • Score X: Used when patient is intubated or has a mechanical barrier to speech 8

Clinical Significance

  • Dysarthria scoring on the NIHSS helps quantify neurologic deficits in stroke patients 7
  • Mild to moderate dysarthria (score of 1) contributes to the overall NIHSS score, which ranges from 0-42 7
  • NIHSS scores below 5 indicate small strokes, while scores above 20 suggest large strokes 7