Praxis Medical Insights

Est. 2024 • Clinical Guidelines Distilled

Made possible by volunteer editors from the University of Calgary & University of Alberta

Last Updated: 10/6/2025

Imaging in Chronic Migraine

Diagnostic Yield and Indications

  • The rate of finding serious intracranial abnormalities in patients with chronic headache and normal neurological examination is only 0.5% (95% CI: 0.2-1.0%), which is comparable to the 0.4% rate of incidental findings in completely asymptomatic volunteers 1
  • For migraine patients specifically with normal neurological examination, the rate of serious abnormality is even lower at 0.2% (95% CI: 0.02-0.7%) 1
  • Neuroimaging is not usually warranted for patients with migraine and normal neurological examination 1
  • New or unexplained abnormal neurological findings on examination significantly increase the probability of finding intracranial pathology 1
  • A change in headache pattern, particularly if headaches are progressively worsening, have new characteristics, or show orthostatic features, may indicate the need for repeat imaging 2, 3, 4
  • Severe or worsening headache that is refractory to appropriate medical management may require repeat imaging 5

Management Approach

  • Consider multidisciplinary evaluation if headaches remain refractory to initial prophylactic treatment 5

REFERENCES

5

Treatment of Headache from Head Trauma [LINK]

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025